Darwin's Legacy Confirmed on the 200th
Anniversary of His Birth

150 years ago, Darwin said that there was not even one single transitional form fossil. Not even one single transitional fossil exists after 150 years. According to Darwin, Darwinism is finished.

In 1859, 150 years ago, Darwin said the following in his book the Origin of Species:

WHY, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, DO WE NOT EVERYWHERE SEE INNUMERABLE TRANSITIONAL FORMS? Why is not all nature In confusIon instead of the species being, as we see them, WELL DEFINED?

INNUMERABLE TRANSITIONAL FORMS MUST HAVE EXISTED, WHY DO WE NOT FIND THEM EMBEDDED IN COUNTLESS NUMBERS IN THE CRUST OF THE EARTH?

WHY THEN IS NOT EVERY GEOLOGICAL FORMATION AND EVERY STRATUM FULL OF SUCH INTERMEDIATE LINKS?
Geology assuredly DOES NOT REVEAL any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, IS THE MOST OBVIOUS AND GRAVEST OBJECTION WHICH CAN BE URGED AGAINST MY THEORY. (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, pp. 172, 280)

Darwin's words he uttered 150 years ago have now come true!

Now, as Darwin said in the 19th century, there is actually NO SUCH THING AS A TRANSITIONAL FORM.

More than 100 million fossils have been unearthed in the Earth's crust. Yet NOT ONE OF THEM IS A TRANSITIONAL FORM.

These 100 million fossils unearthed reveal that NATURE IS NOT IN  A STATE OF CONFUSION, as Darwin anticipated, BUT IS RATHER FULL OF COMPLETE, PERFECT, FLAWLESS LIVING THINGS WITH ALL THEIR PARTS INTACT.

IN NO GEOLOGICAL FORMATION or STRATUM IS THERE ONE TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSIL that shows the alleged connection between living things.

Above all, new sciences have shown that CELLS, CHROMOSOMES and PROTEINS ARE EXTRAORDINARILY COMPLEX.

It has been discovered that DNA possesses ENOUGH INFORMATION TO FILL ONE MILLION ENCYCLOPEDIA PAGES and it is IMPOSSIBLE for such a marvelous structure TO HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE BY CHANCE.

It has been realized that atoms - the most basic building blocks of everything -HAVE A PERFECT ORDER AND COMPLEXITY.

This glorious order and  unique, flawless artistry on Earth has been revealed as, again just as Darwin said,  THE GRAVEST OBJECTION THAT WOULD BE RAISED AGAINST HIS THEORY.

Contemporary Darwinists have confirmed the truth of this legacy:

Niles Eldredge (Paleontologist at Harvard University):
Indeed, the sudden appearance of a varied, well-preserved array of fossils, which geologists have used to mark the beginnings of the Cambrian Period (the oldest division of the Paleozoic Era) does pose a fascinating intellectual challenge.1

Derek W. Ager (Paleontologist at University College, Swansea):
The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail, whether at the level of orders or of species, we find - over and over again - not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another.2

Mark Czarnecki (Evolutionist paleontologist):
A major problem in proving the theory [of evolution] has been the fossil record, the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants - instead, species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.3

Carlton E. Brett (Professor of Geology at the University of Cincinnati):
Did life on Earth change steadily and gradually through time? The fossil record emphatically says "no."4

Dr. Colin Patterson (Evolutionist Paleontologist and Curator of London's Natural History Museum):
You say that I should at least "show a photo of the fossil from which each type of organism was derived." I will lay it on the line - there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.5

David B. Kitts (Professor of the History of Science at Oklahoma University):
Evolution requires intermediate forms between species, and paleontology does not provide them.6

Mark Ridley (Zoologist at Oxford University):
In any case, no real evolutionist . . . uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation. . .7

Steven M. Stanley (Professor of Paleontology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa):
The known fossil record fails to document a single example of phyletic evolution [the evolution of a species' entire population into a new species] accomplishing a major morphologic [structural] transition and hence offers no evidence that the gradualistic model [of evolution] can be valid.8

Hoimar Von Ditfurth (A German Professor of Neurology and Psychiatry and Evolutionist Science Writer):
When we look back, we see there is no need to have been surprised at our failure to find those transitional forms searched for almost painfully. Because the great likelihood is that such transitional stages never existed.9

Tom Kemp (Curator of The Zoological Collections at Oxford University:
In no single adequately documented case is it possible to trace a transition, species by species, from one genus to another.10

Dr. Colin Patterson (Evolutionist Paleontologist and Curator of London's Natural History Museum):
[Stephen Jay] Gould [of Harvard] and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils.11

We therefore congratulate Darwin!

From the scientific proofs of 21st century, it now appears that Darwin was very foresighted indeed! 150 years ago, he said, "There is even not one single transitional fossil." And now, millions of fossil specimens confirm that there is NOT ONE SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM FOSSIL WHATSOEVER! Darwin's legacy has been proven right! On the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth, we congratulate Darwin on his prudence and on this important prediction.

1 Niles Eldredge The Monkey Business: A Scientist Looks at Creationism, Washington Square Press, New York, 1982, p.44
2 Derek A. Ager, "The Nature of the Fossil Record," Proceedings of the British Geological Association, Vol. 87, 1976, p. 133
3 Mark Czarnecki, "The Revival of the Creationist Crusade," MacLean's, 19 January 1981, p. 56
4 Carlton E. Brett, "Stasis: Life in the Balance." Geotimes, Vol. 40, Mar. 1995, p. 18
5 From a letter dated 10 April, 1979, quoted in L. D. Sunderland's Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems, 4th edition, Master Books, 1988
6 David B]. Kitts, "Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory," Evolution , Vol. 28, September 1974, p. 487
7 Mark Ridley, "Who Doubts Evolution?," New Scientist, Vol. 90; June 25, 1981, p. 831
8 Stanley, Stephen M., Macroevolution--Pattern and Process, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1979, p. 39
9 Hoimar Von Ditfurth, Dinozorların Sessiz Gecesi 2, ["The Silent Night of the Dinosaurs 2"] p. 22.
10 Thomas S. Kemp, Mammal-Like Reptiles and the Origin of Mammals, New York: Academic Press, 1982, p. 319
11 Colin Patterson, letter to Luther Sunderland dated April 10, 1979, quoted in L.D. Sunderland Darwin's Enigma, p. 89

FIFTEEN PROOFS THAT DISPROVE DARWIN ON THE 200th ANNIVERSARY OF HIS BIRTH

WHAT DARWIN DIDN'T KNOW

   1. Not one single protein can come into being by chance.
Proteins are complex molecules that both represent the building blocks of living cells and also assume various functions within the cell. When the chances of an average protein molecule emerging by chance are calculated, the result is a number consisting of 10 followed by 950 zeros. In practical mathematical terms, such a figure represents "zero probability."

   2. Irreducibly complex organs refute evolution.
Irreducible complexity is a characteristic that invalidates the claim of gradual development that lies at the basis of the theory of evolution. For example, there is irreducible complexity in the eye and in wings. It is impossible for the organelles that combine to make up the eye, such as the tear gland, the retina and iris to form individually by chance. Because sight will only occur when all the components of the eye are all perfectly formed. The same thing applies to the wing.

   3. The inconceivable amount of information in DNA repudiates chance.
The information concerning all characteristics, from a person's physical appearance to the structure of their internal organs is encoded by a special system in their DNA. If we were to try to put the genetic information in DNA down on paper, we would need to create a huge library of 900 volumes of 500 pages each. But this inconceivable quantity of information is contained in those parts of DNA known as "genes." And it is an absolute fact that DNA cannot emerge by chance. 

   4. The fossil record points to Creation.   
Although some 100 million fossils belonging to 250,000 different species have been unearthed, not even one supports Darwinism. Each one of the fossils discovered, belongs to fully formed and flawless organisms. Were evolutionists' claims true, a large part out of so many fossils should belong to "intermediate life forms," though not a single one actually does. 

   5. Life forms appeared suddenly in the Cambrian Period.
Nearly all the main physical structures in living things (categories such as arthropods, chordates etc.) emerged in the Cambrian Period, some 530 million years ago. While only 1 or 2 of these main categories existed prior to the Cambrian, more than 50 emerged suddenly in different parts of the world during the Cambrian Period. Pre-Cambrian life forms have simpler structures, while those from the Cambrian are incomparably more complex. For example, there is no difference between the structure of the eye of the trilobite, which emerged during this period, and that of eyes today.

   6. "Living fossils" are a response to evolutionist myths.
Living fossils are striking proof that, totally demolish the theory of evolution's claim of "gradual development." The reason why they are known as "living fossils" is that despite being hundreds of millions of years old, they are identical to specimens living today. There are many specimens of living fossils, from ants to trees and from bats to sharks. This is definitive evidence that no evolution ever took place in the course of natural history.

   7. Reptiles are not the ancestors of birds.
Evolutionists are no longer able to point to Archaeopteryx as an intermediate form between reptiles and birds. Examinations of this fossil shown that it is not a transitional form, and that it is an extinct bird with a few different features to those of present-day birds.  The presence of a breastbone indicating powerful flight muscles and an asymmetric feather structure identical to that in modern-day birds show that the animal was able to fly to perfection.

   8. Fish did not emerge onto dry land.
Evolutionists used to point to the fish known as the Coelacanth as evidence for the myth of a transition from water to dry land. It used to be thought that the Coelacanth represented an intermediate form between fish and amphibians. However, a "living" specimen of a Coelacanth was caught in the Indian Ocean in 1938. More than 200 other specimens have been caught since. Examinations of living Coelacanths revealed that it is a perfectly structured fish and that all the previous conjectures about the fossils was mistaken.

   9. Mutations do not form new species.

      Mutations are breakages or dislocations occurring as a result of radiation or chemical agents in the DNA molecule in the nucleus of the living cell that carries genetic information.  DNA has a highly complex structure. Therefore, any random change in the molecule will be damaging to it. Mutations usually lead to irreparable damage and deformity, and even to death. The people exposed to the disasters at Hiroshima, Nagasaki or Chernobyl are living indications of this. The claim that mutations are an evolutionary mechanism is proof of the dead-end in which the theory of evolution finds itself.

  10. Natural selection does not lead to evolution.
Natural selection is an expression of the survival of strong living things best suited to their surroundings. But this does not give rise to any new species. For example, in a herd of zebra under threat from predators, those zebras able to run fast will survive and the herd will eventually come to consist of fast-running individuals. But this process is a limited one and cannot turn the zebra into any other species. Because zebra have their own unique skeletal structure and physiology recorded in their DNA, and the struggle against predators cannot alter that information nor bestow any new genetic information on the zebra.

  11. Human beings never evolved, but were created as humans.
It has emerged that the human family tree is a diagram drawn up solely in the light of evolutionists' imaginations. Evolutionists maintained that human beings emerged gradually in the following line of progression: "Australopithecines > Homo habilis > Homo erectus> Homo sapiens" They sought to give the impression that each one of the life forms in that list was the forerunner of the one after it. But the discovery of these life forms, which evolutionists portray as one another's ancestors, right beside one another has demolished this family tree. The latest discoveries by paleoanthropologists show that Australopithecines, Homo habilis and Homo erectus existed at the same time in different parts of the world.

  12. Evolutionists resort to frauds.
Evolutionists also resort to frauds in order to "prove" their theory. To date, there has been a great deal of such evolutionist fraud as that in embryo drawings and in fossils being hidden away or destroyed. The most striking example is the Piltdown Man fraud. 
It was suggested that a skull discovered in 1912 near Piltdown in England belonged to an "ape-man." This fossil, the skull of which exhibited human features and the jaw those of an orang utan, was displayed in the famous British Museum for 40 years. However, it was finally exposed as a forgery in 1953. The fossil had been produced by evolutionists who combined a human skull and an orangutan jaw and used chemicals to give it an aged appearance.